The Da Vinci Code claims Jesus married Mary Magdalene, where is the proof?

Tuesday, 28 December 2010 § 0

Code of the claim

(Film by Ron Howard and starring Tom Hanks, Audrey Tautou, Ian McKellen, Paul Bettany and Jean Reno, directed by Dan Brown's novel), the heart of The Da Vinci Code, Mary Magdalene and Jesus Christ (is the claim that we'll get married), Mary and her Call 'em.

The evidence of the character Sir Leigh Teabing document he claimed was written by the apostle Philip and the Gospel of Philip, he said. Mary is my Em Teabing refers to the passage of Jesus' "companion"Teabing and his wife, what is interpreted. He kissed your mouth that Jesus is often part of it goes on.

Uncritically, and the rest of the novel the main character is actually thinking / to accept these claims about the film. But are they? Did Jesus really marry Mary emwa? Consider this fact.

Source return

What do the Bible, the first horse? We are immediately written to the historical accounts of Jesus' life, because I appeal to the BibleEvent occurred. Matthew and John were eyewitnesses of the incident. Mark reported the testimony of the Apostle Peter wrote. 1:03) Luke state probes ("From the beginning Luke, he" carefully, and read a good book Acts of (he volume of the two) the revelation of the person as a partner, Paul, he who often have access to the period of his earthly ministry Jesus knew while. New issues and events during the rest of the BibleAfter the death and resurrection of Jesus until about 50 years.

The Bible nowhere mentions Jesus raised her. On the contrary, Matthew 19:11-12, Jesus himself does not know the married couple as a gift from God to the life of a compliment:

Not everyone, but only those who can accept this word, it will be granted. Some are eunuchs because they were born, for that other man-made roads, and other people have made themselves eunuchs for two drinksThe kingdom of heaven. Take it can accommodate one.

Apparently so, Jesus allowed himself: his self-imposed mission to give away for the wedding. John the Baptist and the apostle Paul (1 Corinthians 9:05 in reference) traveled to the desert as well. Jewish Essenes and perhaps other members of the threat to accumulate prefer to live in celibacy.

Who is Mary?

Mary M. Luke 8:02, Jesus (one of whom seven devils were cast have been found;Mark 16:09). Her His disciples, 'Jesus is one of, (Jerusalem, was to accompany him in Galilee and between people. Her mark in the garden outside the empty tomb of Jesus, Mary See was increased 15:40-41, 47 , 16:1-8 [9-11], 27:55-56, 28:1-10, Luke 23:49, 55-56, 24:1-11, Matthew John 20: 1-2, 10 -18). The term 'Mary' is probably the Sea of Galilee, Capernaum, and Tiberias on the west coast between the cities of about half "of the person of Mary Magdalene" means.

WrongIdentity

Sister, Mary M. Pharisees of Jerusalem, just outside, Martha and Lazarus, in Judea, Bethany, Mary and often confusing. She is not the name of Simon's house on the fault of a sinful woman Jesus' feet and she also cut The tears (see Luke 7:36-50), she was struck in the head. If any) 8:02 because she introduced her Em, Mary, verses later (when he a new man? Some women also think Mary M.John 7:00 to 8:11 after 53 minutes of recorded adultery (missing from many early manuscripts). John, the Gospel accounts of the text or the other three standards to support anything.

Why Women Do not make the heroine?

The second and third century Gnostics, Mary M. to take a vision of Jesus, and said that more women should be recorded, whether recorded in John 20. In fact, they offered us to meet the discourse of Jesus with Mary did you would have hadMary, Mary, and they changing emeuro M. [Maria] is the gospel of Jesus, who recorded the document secret teachings, the disciples said.

It's Jesus, John 11:00 5 minutes apparently her more than any other woman you love, It says no, but, Gnostics and Mary of Bethany, Maria, this confusion seems to be "Jesus, Martha and her sister's love and Lazarus." The Gospel of Mary, the contents of the gnostic nature was completely because we can confidently reject itThis historic authentic conversation was recorded.

Because it's so different from what Jesus taught them a woman, because women at the end of the article, and Andrew said, denied that Mary and Peter. Levi (Matthew and equality), but severe, Andrew and Peter, and ending with his disciples to go out and preach the kingdom since she probably accepted the teachings of the real, preaching.

'Partnership' and 'kiss'

DocumentsNot so much, Mary M., but I do not speak the Gospel of Philip, also known as:

Mary his mother, his sister, Mary, one of his colleagues were: seiteotseupnida always walk with the Lord. His sister and his mother Mary and his colleagues were each ....



And the companion of Mary Magdalene [Perhaps "God", missing]. More than her [missing, "Jesus loved"] [perhaps, missing the "all"] the disciples ["and" perhaps, missing] kiss her[". Disciples its offensive had" disappeared, likely] [is missing, probably "no"] on her [. "Mouth" missing] the rest of them said to him: "Why are you her love more of what we do in all cases In "the Savior said unto them," Why I love her like that? a blind man in a dark look at both together, when they differ from each other. When light, you will see the light, who will remain in the dark is blind. "reporting that

DespiteIn Aramaic, the Da Vinci Code, Sir Leigh Teabing character claims, "companion" in the context of neunyi phrase "woman" mean anything like The Da Vinci Code suggests Jesus married Mary Em Coptic manuscript of the original Gospel of Philip, Greek, Aramaic means associated with the Egyptian language.

"Companion" from the Greek word means that the koino - we halyida "One who shares a companion, partner, competitor." Current position where a new generation of twelve wordsThe Bible, once it girl, Matthew 23:30, Luke 5:10, 1 Corinthians 10:18, 20, 2 Corinthians 1:07, 8:23, Philemon 17, Hebrews 10:33, 1 Peter 5 Meaning: 1, 2, Peter 1:04.

Part of the Gospel of Philip, Mary M. and simply indicates that God, nothing more was a good disciple.
The plaintiffs in parentheses defects (gap or hole) is. Missing characters should be built or rebuilt the degree of uncertainty still correct. The EditorDocument Status:

[T] here they buried while remaining, and still advanced Unfortunately, completely 1945 and of their Among the findings in the age of stopping was not, no doubt, they are 400 CE around the buried before the start itself, the book's physical deterioration is the later of three decades Last detention. Only a few characters, they are often, but if you can not adequately be filled must be empty just a big hole. (Robinson, 2-3).
It is entirelyAs the "mouth" is not a reconstruction. Missing word cheeks, hands, and even had his forehead. Nobody knows for sure.

We know that sexual undertones present context, just like her status as disciples, kiss means is proposed. She likes the idea of the state can be based on the back of the tomb of the post-resurrection appearance of Jesus of the Gospel of Philip Gnostic must be derived from the author.

But the more plausible reason may beMary M. inconsolable grief filled the cross and empty tomb just worse. Jesus on her broken heart can be noticed especially after her compassion. Another possible explanation he gives her a way to honor her and other women that choice, they were the first witnesses to the resurrection of the Lord.

Unreliable claims

However, the Gospel of Philip and the marriage between Jesus and Mary M., but the report (whichDoes not), remains in circulation long after formal gnostic gospel of the document is a simple argument.

Now, as the plaintiff knows of the other documents were discovered in 1945, "Overpriced Hammadi Library." All of them were buried scholars approximate date of 400 CE was issued. Review of the Gospel of Philip, shows a secondary character. For example, use, and the past tense to say the temple in Jerusalem(Destruction of Jerusalem in the right place to 70th CE), and they provide an interpretation of the Gnostic gospel, and they are known as the standard phrase refers to the letter. All the original Gospel of Philip, while very likely represents an early 400 CE, probably more than one hundred years since the New Testament and dates.

Why can we trust?

The New Testament in writing for a while, we can be trusted to provide reliable accountsThe majority of witnesses have been written yet confirmed or denied that he was alive. Diameter of the accounts we are much later, the fourth century, and other papers from the Gospel of Philip seconds to read and input are propagated by the apostles was a different story against the doctrines of. Its namesake, unlike the works of Leonardo da Vinci, The Da Vinci Code is a masterpiece of research at all --- even his historical blunders are glaring.

Do you need to go deeper?

If you want toInclude spaces for reading the Gospel of Philip, Gospel of Mary, the English translation of the authority, you can find Em Dawn Robinson, James, etc ..., nag Hammadi Library, 3d ed. (New York: Harper & Row, 1988). (Unfortunately, the online version of the Gospel of Philip is not a flaw, but they belong to the text proposed by the speculation.) You can make reservations, but the Gospel of Mary, and other gnostic Gospel of Philip page on EdgarHennecke and Wilhelm Schneemelcher, EDS is. The new issue of abduction of the Bible. 1: Gospels and Related written, R. MCL. Wilson, trans. (Philadelphia, PA: Westminster, 1963). Gnosticism and Christianity more information about the relationship, Ronald Nash, the Gospel and the Greeks refer to: two-dimensional, Ed, pagan ideas borrowed from the New Testament does?. (Phillipsburg, NJ: P & R, 2003) and Edwin Yamauchi, Gnostic Christian Book: The proposed two-dimensional examination of evidence, Ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1983).

Thanks To : discount valleys of neptune songs : review and comparison discount the big valley review discount volume two songs review dave matthews

What's this?

You are currently reading The Da Vinci Code claims Jesus married Mary Magdalene, where is the proof? at discount valleys of neptune songs review.

meta

§ Leave a Reply